Armour & Co. v. Carlas’s Empirical Analysis
142 F. 721 · 1905
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1940
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grand Trunk Ry Co of Canada v. Ives · Hough v. Railway Co. · Indianapolis and St Louis Railroad Company v. Horst · Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. Tolson · Gardner v. Michigan Central Railroad
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.