Thayer & Chandler v. Wold’s Empirical Analysis
142 F. 776 · 1906
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1933
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bundy Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Time-Register Co. · Adam v. Folger · Red Jacket Manuf'g Co. v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is indeed possible to reason from a Oorlis engine to a watch spring, but the journey will lead the mind over an unehartered highway and across unbridged waters. So, here, the adaptation of the idea of the oil-distributing device to the pencil-sized air brush seems to me to involve several inventive steps.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Braselton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.