In re Walder’s Empirical Analysis
142 F. 784 · 1906
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 1930
most recently cited
3 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The testimony upon which the order is based settles beyond a vestige of doubt that a large quantity of goods had been accumulated in the hands of the bankrupt shortly before his adjudication. It is equally certain that a large part of them were not turned over to the trustee. Such a situation demands a satisfactory explanation from the bankrupt which accounts for their disappearance, and, if nothing of that kind appears, an order by the referee directing that the missing goods be turned over would be a proper order.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Herskovitz““If the order shall be affirmed, and the bankrupt shall fail to comply with its terms, contempt proceedings will naturally follow, and no good purpose would be served by adopting a lower order of proof now than will be required when action shall be taken in the next step.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Cantor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.