In re Sully’s Empirical Analysis
142 F. 895 · 1905
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 1934
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on George West Co v. Lea · In re Lewensohn · 4 E.H. Smith 163 - Lewis v. . Cook · Spang, Chalfant & Co. v. Taylor · Dressel v. North State Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It would be an intolerable practice to permit any debtor sued by a trustee, by reason of bis interest in tbe result of tbe suit, to intervene in bankruptcy, file objections to and litigate the claims proved by tbe creditors, or to take any measures to Interfere with tbe proceedings or to annul the adjudication, in order to defeat the right of the trustee to maintain the action. Such a practice would give rise to interminable delay and expense in the settlement of estates.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rosenbaum v. Dutton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.