United States v. Bransen’s Empirical Analysis
142 F.2d 232 · 1944
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably Washington v. United States (1954), Casey v. Albertson's Inc. (2004)
29 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. · Danforth v. United States · Campbell v. American Foreign S. S. Corp. · United States v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Newly discovered evidence,’ within Federal Rule 59, refers to evidence of facts existing at time of trial, of which aggrieved party was excusably ignorant. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 59, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.