In re D'Arcy’s Empirical Analysis
142 F.2d 313 · 1944
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 1996 · most notably Reid v. White Motor Corp. (1989), Jameson v. Jameson (1949)
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Hark · England v. Gebhardt · Estate of Hague v. Commissioner · Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a statement in an opinion of the conclusion reached by the court, even though couched in mandatory terms, cannot serve as the order or judgment of the court”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“since under Civil Procedure Rule 58 [the district court’s order] could not be effective prior to its entry, it is clear that the attempt of the court to date the order back to the time of the filing of its opinion was wholly ineffective to deprive the appellant of its right to appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the federal courts an opinion is not a part of the record proper,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.