Bowles v. Stapleton

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1944.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-03-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1948

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bowles v. Stapleton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Fleming James, Jr., Director, Litigation Division, Office of Price Administration, of Washington, D. C., and Max D. Melville, Regional Litigation Atty., Office of Price Administration, of Denver, Colo., for appellant.

¶2Malcolm Lindsey, City Atty., Frank L. Hays, Asst. City Atty., Kenneth W. Robinson, Paul M. Clark, Schaetzel S¿ Knight, and Ernest B. Fowler, all of Denver, Colo., and Richard Simon, of Englewood, Colo., for appellees.

¶3Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appeal, 53 F.Supp. 336, dismissed pursuant to stipulation.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Orie Leon Phillips
Chief Judge
Sam Gilbert Bratton
Chief Judge
Walter August Huxman
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Fleming James, Jr., Director, Litigation Division, Office of Price Administration, of Washington, D. C., and Max D. Melville, Regional Litigation Atty., Office of Price Administration, of Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Malcolm Lindsey, City Atty., Frank L. Hays, Asst. City Atty., Kenneth W. Robinson, Paul M. Clark, Schaetzel S¿ Knight, and Ernest B. Fowler, all of Denver, Colo., and Richard Simon, of Englewood, Colo., for appellees.