Commissioner v. Santa Eulalia Mining Co.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1944.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-04-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1982

2 counsel of record

Relies on Santa Eulalia Mining Co. v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-04-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Samuel O. Clark, Jr:, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

¶2Nathan Moran, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

¶3Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the motion of petitioner for dismissal of petition to review, 2 T.C. 241, counsel for respondent consenting thereto, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the motion be and hereby is granted, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.