Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.2d 559 - Flett v. Bowles

Flett v. Bowles’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.2d 559 · 1944

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
February 1953
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kales · Harlem Metal Corp. v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the brokerage allowance is not in any proper sense a `service charge,' but that the brokerage provision in fact establishes two sets of ceiling prices for sales of the same commodity at the same distribution level.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “type of operation to a competitive handicap in favor of brokers which was not characteristic of the industry prior to price control and which”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “wholly unnecessary for the effectuation of the purposes of the Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.