Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.2d 648 - Barnes v. United States

Barnes v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.2d 648 · 1944

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
January 1993
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1993

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

50194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 333 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 342 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)

Relies on United States v. Dotterweich · Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant · Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · George McDermott v. State of Wisconsin · Alfred Dozier v. State of Alabama

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.