Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.2d 883 - Potts v. Potts

Potts v. Potts’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.2d 883 · 1944

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
4
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 1999 · most notably Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Hall (1982), Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corp. (1993)

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

210194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 701 · 11 U.S.C. § 702 · 11 U.S.C. § 722

Relies on Kalb v. Feuerstein · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co. · Fairbanks Steam Shovel Company v. Wills, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Federal Contracting Company · Schumacher v. Beeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon filing a petition under Chapter XII, all of the property of the debtor is brought within the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court which jurisdiction is paramount and exclusive and thereafter no action taken in any other court can affect the proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court. Since the judgment of the state court of July 26, 1943, is the sole fqundation for claimant Potts’ second claim, the judgment being void, the claim is void and, likewise, the whole decree of the state court.” In re Potts, 142 F.2d 883, 888 (1944) [emphasis added].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.