Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.2d 9 - Nolan v. Werth

Nolan v. Werth’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.2d 9 · 1944

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 1978 · most notably Hallman v. Federal Parking Services, Inc. (1957), Conrad v. Medina (1946)

1 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

4101944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lawson v. United States Mining Co. · McCaughn v. Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co. · Hearst Radio, Inc. v. Good · United States v. Ingalls · Werth v. Nolan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" * * * the evidence was such that either one of two different conclusions might reasonably have been drawn from it, and in such a case we have said time and again the decision is for the trial court; that its judgment must stand and that the appellate court may not reweigh the evidence or override the findings, except where it clearly appears they are manifestly wrong. In the case we have here it is enough to say, as the Supreme Court said in Lawson v. United States Mining Co., 207 U.S. 1 -12, 28 S.Ct. 15 , 52 L.Ed. 65 , that if the testimony is not sufficient to show that the trial court’s decision is necessarily right, it wholly fails to show that it is necessarily wrong, * * *.” 2”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.