Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.3d 1127 - Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio

Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.3d 1127 · 1998

Citation profile

140
cited by 140 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 13 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. (1999), Gotocom Inc v. The Walt Disney Company Disney Enterprises Inc Infoseek Corporation Montrose Corporation

33 federal appellate · 13 district ·

7101998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amf Incorporated v. Sleekcraft Boats E · 11 Cal. 4th 376 - Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. · Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Company · Russell v. Rolfs · Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) strength of the mark; (2) proximity or relatedness of the goods; (3) similarity of sight, sound, and meaning; (4) evidence of actual confusion; (5) marketing channels; (6) type of goods and purchaser care; (7) intent; and (8) likelihood of expansion.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he test for likelihood of confusion is whether a `reasonably prudent consumer' in the marketplace is likely to be confused as to the origin of the good or service bearing one of the marks.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The ultimate question in a reverse confusion case is whether consumers doing business with the senior user might mistakenly believe that they are dealing with the junior user.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.