United States v. Dunson’s Empirical Analysis
142 F.3d 1213 · 1998
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2019
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Mejia-Alarcon · United States v. Pappert · United States v. Gadison · United States v. Keys · United States v. Janusz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“crimes such as theft, robbery, or shoplifting do not involve ‘dishonesty or false statement’ within the meaning of Rule 609(a)(2)”); McHenry v. Chadwick, 896 F.2d 184, 188 (6th Cir. 1990) (shoplifting not a basis for Rule 609(a)(2) impeachment); United States v. Ashley, 569 F.2d 975, 979 (5th Cir. 1978) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Winegardner“we have suggested that the trial court may look beyond the elements of an offense that is not considered a per se crime of dishonesty to determine whether the particular conviction rested upon facts establishing dishonesty or false statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burke v. Regalado“. See also United States v. Dunson, 142 F.3d 1213, 1215 (10th Cir. 1998) (shoplifting does not per se involve dishonesty or false statement); United States v. Amaechi, 991 F.2d 374, 379 (7th Cir. 1993) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Winegardner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.