Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.3d 1252 - Rodgers v. Singletary

Rodgers v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.3d 1252 · 1998

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Allison v. McGhan Medical Corp. (1999), Burger King Corp. v. Weaver (1999)

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

160199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sandin v. Conner · Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation · Hale v. Tallapoosa County · Frazier v. Coughlin · Talley v. Hesse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[An] inmate can only claim a due process violation if he can show deprivation of a protected liberty interest, and that such interests are generally limited to (a) those actions that unexpectedly alter the inmate’s term of imprisonment; and (b) those actions that impose an atypical and significant hardship in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.