In re Cargill

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1998.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1998-06-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2000

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Carter v. City of Miami · Isenbergh v. Knight-Ridder Newspaper Sales, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1998-06-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stephen C. Bayliss, Georgia Resource Center, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner.

¶2Paula K. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, GA, for Respondent.

¶3Before HATCHETT, -Chief Judge, and COX and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Petitioner DAVID LOOMUS CARGILL’s (1) Application for Permission to File a Second Habeas Corpus Petition in the District Court is DENIED; (2) Request to Treat the Application as a First Habeas Corpus Petition and Transfer the Petition to the District Court is DENIED; and (3) Motion for Stay of Execution is DENIED.