Tejeda v. Dubois’s Empirical Analysis
142 F.3d 18 · 1998
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably Slack v. McDaniel (2000), Horton v. Allen (2004)
9 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lindh v. Murphy · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · United States v. Hector Francisco Molina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must demonstrate that there was a reasonable probability that but for [his attorney’s] errors, the outcome of the trial would have been different. For that purpose a reasonable probability is defined as “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” And in that respect our analysis is not limited to outcome determination — we must also contemplate “whether the result of the proceeding was fundamentally unfair or unreliable.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. North v. McDonough“more stringent limitations on the federal courts’ review of state court determinations via habeas proceedings” did not apply and we reviewed his ineffective assistance claim de novo. Id. at 22 . More over, our review of the record in this case indicates other dissimilarities. We found that Tejeda’s counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. North v. McDonough“in light of all the circumstances, the identified acts or omissions [allegedly made by his counsel] were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.