Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 F.3d 560 - Fidelity Partners, Inc. v. First Trust Co.

Fidelity Partners, Inc. v. First Trust Co.’s Empirical Analysis

142 F.3d 560 · 1998

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2014

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Andrew Backo, Mike Karaman, Casmir MacKo James Barno and Ercell Cummings v. Local 281, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Rudy Colton, Individually and as President of Local 281, Duane Kane, Individually and as Vice President of Local 281, and Ervin B. Lambert, United States of America v. Rudy Colton and Ervin B. Lambert · Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. Chuidian · Browning-Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc. v. Muszynski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This action is essentially an attachment (garnishment) proceeding, and the January 13 letter [indicating that ING Bank had sold Philguarantee’s participation interest in the FLIRBs on December 6, 1997] suggests that the thing Fidelity seeks to attach — Philguarantee’s interest in the FLIRBs — no longer exists, at least not within the ownership of Phil-guarantee .... If the Court determines that [Philguarantee’s] interest [in the FLIRBs] was sold on December 6, the entire controversy concerning Philguar-antee’s interest in the FLIRBs has become moot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.