Morgan v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
142 F.3d 670 · 1998
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation (1999), Baby Food Antitrust Litigation Ll v. Hj Bnnc Bcn J
24 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Parker v. Levy · Jaffee v. United States · Chiu v. United States · Hanover Potato Products, Inc. v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a reasonable basis in truth for the facts alleged; (2) a reasonable basis in law for the theory it propounded; and (3) a reasonable connection between the facts alleged and the legal theory advanced.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence““fees and other expenses ..., unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(A). The District Court denied appellant’s motion for fees particularly in light of the fact that both that Court and our Court had found that the Commissioner’s position was supported by substantial evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“when the district court's decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.