Hines v. Young

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-09-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2013

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-09-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Gregory S. Hines appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and dismissing his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hines v. Young, No. CA-04-72-7 (W.D.Va. Mar. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED