Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Fla. 1 - Winter v. Mack

Winter v. Mack’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1989

8 state decisions

2019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bryan · Gentry-Futch Co. v. Gentry · State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of Sarasota · McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board · State v. Gleason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule is well settled in Florida that quo warranto is the proper remedy to test the right of a person to hold an office or franchise or exercise some right or privilege, the peculiar powers of which are derived from the State." (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.