Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Fla. 218 - Watson v. State

Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

10019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Luster v. State · Campbell v. State · Gordon v. State · Brevaldo v. State · Lockhart v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While it is true that the help or assistance of able and resourceful counsel during the progress of trial cannot be questioned, this Court is without power to reverse a case because the defendants in a criminal case were not represented by counsel and for that reason failed to obtain a fair trial. The Legislature of Florida, by the enactment of Section 8375, C.G.L., 4 restricts the power of the courts to appoint counsel for indigent defendants at public expense to-capital cases. The case at bar is not a capital case and therefore no duty rested on the lower court to supply counsel for plaintiffs in error at public expense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the State to show that the parties lived together openly as if the relation of husband and wife existed. A mere occasional illicit intercourse is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the statute, but it must be shown that there was a living or residing together openly, as if the conjugal relation existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.