Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 FRD 454 - In re Eli Lilly & Co.

In re Eli Lilly & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · Deitchman v. Er Squibb & Sons Inc · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 529 F. Supp. 866 - Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “relevance, necessity to resolve disputed facts and that the information [would not be] otherwise available.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.