Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 HAW 1 - Castro v. Melchor.

Castro v. Melchor.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Robinette · Colautti v. Franklin · Wilkinson v. Austin · Castro v. United States · Greenlaw v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the meaning of the ambiguous words may be sought by examining the context, with which the ambiguous words, phrases, and sentences may be compared, in order to ascertain their true meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]ur foremost obligation is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature, which is to be obtained primarily from the language contained in the statute itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[R]emedial statutes should be liberally construed to suppress the perceived evil and advance the remedies provided by such statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.