Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Idaho 431 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bagley · Roviaro v. United States · McCray v. State of Illinois · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · United States v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears in the case that an informer may be able to give testimony relevant to any issue in a criminal case or to a fair determination of a material issue on the merits in a civil case to which a public entity is a party, and the informed public entity invokes the privilege, the court shall give the public entity an opportunity to show in camera facts relevant to determining whether the informer can, in fact, supply that testimony ... If the court finds there is a reasonable probability that the informer can give the testimony, and the public entity elects not to disclose the informer’s identity, in criminal eases the court on motion of the defendant or on its own motion shall grant appropriate relief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.