142 Ill. App. 3d 422 - People v. Bormet’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2000
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Francis v. Franklin · 35 Ill. 2d 467 - The People v. Weinstein · 84 Ill. 2d 415 - People v. Housby · 87 Ill. 2d 216 - People v. Ogunsola · 19 Ill. 2d 50 - The People v. Benson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Failure to have sufficient funds or credit with the depository when the check or other order is issued or delivered, or when such check or other order is presented for payment and dishonored on each of 2 occasions at least 7 days apart, is prima facie evidence that the offender knows that it will not be paid by the depository, and that he has the intent to defraud.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 17 — l(B)(d).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Shepard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.