142 Ill. App. 3d 550 - Warren v. LeMay’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 3 district · 116 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 205 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 201 Ill. 2d 134 - Oliveira v. Amoco Oil Co. (2002), 163 Ill. 2d 33 - Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc. (1994)
35 federal appellate · 3 district · 116 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 74 Ill. 2d 172 - Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc. · 91 Ill. 2d 69 - Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co. · 2 Ill. 2d 74 - Ney v. Yellow Cab Co. · 102 Ill. App. 3d 483 - Duhl v. Nash Realty Inc. · 64 Ill. 2d 380 - Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 205 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state of mind is immaterial, and a defendant need not be motivated by an intent to deceive.... By its own terms, the statute requires only that a violator intend for a purchaser to rely on his acts or omissions.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation or the concealment, suppression or omission of a material fact”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'all forms of deceptive and unfair business practices and to grant appropriate remedies to defrauded consumers.’ ” (Warren v. LeMay (1986), 142 Ill. App. 3d 550, 563 , 491 N.E.2d 464 , quoting American Buyers Club v. Honecker (1977), 46 Ill. App. 3d 252, 257 , 361 N.E.2d 1370 .) The statute prohibits”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.