Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ill. App. 3d 827 - Makela v. Roach

142 Ill. App. 3d 827 - Makela v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2013

10 state decisions

701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 92 Ill. 2d 13 - Pelham v. Griesheimer · 102 Ill. 2d 356 - Ogle v. Fuiten · 99 Ill. 2d 312 - York v. Stiefel · 89 Ill. App. 3d 77 - Mettes v. Quinn · First Security Bank v. Bawoll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a party voluntarily elects to follow advice intended to extricate herself from a questionable situation, she comes to this court with unclean hands and may not seek relief from her wrongful conduct through a legal malpractice action.” (Makela, 142 Ill. App. 3d at 832 , 492 N.E.2d at 195 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.