Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 IND 442 - Stumph v. Miller

Stumph v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
October 1960
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 1960

23 state decisions

9018951900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carthage Turnpike Co. v. Andrews · Johnson v. Culver · Colee v. State · Thompson v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance · Rush v. Coal Bluff Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While, therefore, by the aid of the stenographer’s notes or otherwise, the court may make a special finding of the facts, when requested at any time before the entry of judgment. (Thompson v. Insurance Co., 139 Ind. 325 , 38 N. E. 796 ), yet the reasoning in the case of Hartlep v. Cole, supra, makes it clear that it must remain discretionary with the court whether such finding shall be made in case the request does not come before the introduction of,the evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.