Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 MOAPP 567 - Shamp v. Lambert

Shamp v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
6
states following
July 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 1964 · most notably Bouillon v. Laclede Gas Light Co. (1910), Penticost v. Massey (1917)

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

2201909191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garretzen v. Duenckel · Owens v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad · Snyder v. Han. & St. Jos. R. R. · Fullerton v. Fordyce · Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. McKee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law is satisfied if individuals conduct themselves with the degree of care usually exercised by a person of ordinary prudence; and, in thus conducting themselves, they are not required to anticipate negligence on the part of others which may result in entailing injury upon them. The court is authorized to declare a plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence, and thus preclude a recovery, as a matter of law, only when it appears that he or she has voluntarily encountered dangers, and assumed a situation fraught with imminent peril to his or her safety, when considered apart from and without the intervention of the negligence of the actor who entails the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.