Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 N.C. 198 - Hudson v. Railroad

Hudson v. Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
January 1958
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1958

12 state decisions

50190619101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The circumstances did not require the intestate to anticipate that the defendant company, in disregard of its duty, would recklessly turn a car loose on a down grade, which would run into the yard, drive the stationary cars from their position, and crush out his life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “provided that in the exercise of ordinary care he might have foreseen that some injury would likely follow from his negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.