Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 N.C. 538 - Pardon v. Paschal.

Pardon v. Paschal.’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1941
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The only exception presented in the brief of the appellant is that there is no sufficient evidence of abandonment, and that the judge should have so instructed the jury. It nowhere appears in the record that the plaintiff requested the court so to charge, or that the plaintiff handed up any prayer for instructions to the jury. He cannot be heard, therefore, to raise that question by motion to set aside the verdict. `If he is silent when he should speak, he ought not to be heard when he should be silent.' Boon v. Murphy , 108 N.C. 187 , and cases cited. If it is any satisfaction to the plaintiff to know it, we will state that an examination of the record discloses ample evidence to justify the court in submitting the matter to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.