142 N.C. App. 169 - Dunevant v. Dunevant’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coble v. Coble · State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. Eddleman · Carpenter v. Carpenter · Cox v. Dodd · 121 N.C. App. 253 - Gainey v. North Carolina Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] pronouncement by the trial court which does not require the employment of legal principles will be treated as a finding of fact, regardless of how it is denominated in the court's order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]hese `findings of fact' were not included in the agreed statement of facts and while they are actually more in the nature of conclusions of law than strictly factual findings, correctly considered as conclusions of law, they are supported by the agreed statement of facts, and it is immaterial that they were incorrectly included under the heading of `findings of fact' in the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Jac“(citations omitted)); Gibbs v. Wright ; 17 N.C. App. 495, 498 , 195 S.E.2d 40, 43 (1973) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Jac
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.