Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 N.J. Eq. 21 - In Re Lent

142 N.J. Eq. 21 - In Re Lent’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1977

12 state decisions

501948195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marsh v. Mitchell · Eugster v. Eugster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Therefore, it would seem that the only course which the appellants could pursue was to make their attack upon the will offered and if successful then make a further attack upon the earlier will when it was offered, as it would have to be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in a case of this kind, involving the validity of a will, the next of kin, those who would take an interest in the event of intestacy, do have a standing to attack any and all wills of a decedent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.