Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

142 N.J. Super. 287

361 A.2d 111

State v. Saunders

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Argued June 14, 1976.

Decided June 21, 1976.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1976-06-21

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2007

2 state decisions

Relies on Doe v. Commonwealth's Atty. for City of Richmond

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-06-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before Judges KOLE, ARD and COLLESTER.

¶2*288Mr. Alan Silber argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Robert A. Baime, of counsel).

¶3Mr. Roy B. Greenman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for City of Richmond, D.C.,403 F. Supp. 1199, aff'd ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).

¶6Affirmed.

/142/njsuper/287 · .json · Public domain