Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

142 N.J. Super. 323

Mandelbaum v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1976-06-29

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1998

6 state decisions

Relies on McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Commission · David v. Vesta Co. · New Jersey Restaurant Ass'n v. Holderman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Plaintiff, a resident of Bergen County, appeals the rejection of his application for employment as a county detective in Union County because of his nonresidency in Union County. His challenge is to the constitutionality of the residency requirements as established by the controlling statute, namely, N. J. S. A. 11:22-7.

¶2We perceive no constitutional infirmity or impropriety in the provisions or effect of N. J. S. A. 11:22-7. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Comm’n, - U. S. -, 96 S. Ct. 1154, 47 L. Ed. 2d 366 (1976); Abrahams v. Civil Service Comm’n, 65 N. J. 61 (1974). See Troy Hills Village v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp. Council, 68 N. J. 604 (1975); David v. Vesta Co., 45 N. J. 301 (1965); N. J. Restaurant Ass’n v. Holderman, 24 N. J. 295 (1957). See also, Dunne v. Fireman’s Fund Am. Ins. Co., 69 N. J. 244 (1976).

¶3It very well may be that the subsequent enactments adopted by the Legislature in 1972 excepting from the residency requirements of the Civil Service Act applicants for appointment to a municipal fire department (N. J. S. A. 40A:14-9.2) and applicants for appointment to a municipal police department (N. J. S. A. 40A:14-122.2) themselves offend the equal protection proscription of the Constitution *325— although we express no opinion thereon. However this may be, the constitutional invalidity of either or both of these excepting statutes would not affect the constitutionality of N. J. S. A. 11:22-7.

¶4So far as concerns N. J. S. A. 40A:9-1, its provisions in no way concern the class or classes of persons covered by N. J. S. A. 11:22-7. In any event and as earlier indicated, even assuming the constitutional invalidity of N. J. S. A. 40A:9-1 because the excepted offices (most, if not all, of which are appointed for fixed terms) do not form or constitute a reasonable and proper class, that invalidity would in no way affect the constitutionality of N. J. S. A. 11:22-7.

¶5To the extent that it espouses a contrary view, the case of Trainor v. Newark, 137 N. J. Super. 570 (Ch. Div. 1975), is hereby overruled.

¶6Affirmed.

/142/njsuper/323 · .json · Public domain