142 N.J. Super. 575 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1986
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp. · State v. Driver · State v. Cary · State v. McDavitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the stipulation not only must demonstrate clearly defendant’s certain awareness of all the consequences involved in taking the polygraph test but it must, as well, commit the State to its reciprocal obligation to permit the results to be received in evidence irrespective of the outcome of the test. [State v. Smith, 142 N.J.Super. 575, 580 (1976)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Finn“based upon acceptance by the Court of a specific, clear, unequivocal and complete meeting of minds and agreement between the State and an individual that an agreed polygraph testing will be received in evidence upon an offer by either party, irrespective of the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.