State v. Neal’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
96 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Leyva (2011), State v. Ochoa (2008)
96 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Arvizu · United States v. Place · Illinois v. Caballes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By assessing the totality of circumstances, we recognize that officers may draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that might well elude an untrained person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“and that Defendant's consent to the search was valid and not given under duress or coercion. Defendant then entered a conditional guilty plea, and this appeal followed. {6} Although this case was submitted to this panel in 2009, it was discovered that a portion of the recording of the suppression hearing was missing. We ordered the parties to attempt to reconstruct the missing portion, and they submitted their stipulations in June 2011. DISCUSSION {7} In reviewing a district court's decision regarding a motion to suppress, we conduct a two-part analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Davis“[i]t is . . . the duty of appellate courts to shape the parameters of police conduct by placing the constitutional requirement of reasonableness in factual context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Anaya
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.