Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 N.M. 460 - State v. Turner

State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bernal · Herron v. State · State v. DeGraff · State v. Mora · State v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such indicia include the timing, location, and sequencing of the acts, the existence of an intervening event, the defendant's intent as evidenced by his conduct and utterances, and the number of victims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) multiple violations of the same statute, referred to as `unit of prosecution' cases; and (2) violations of multiple statutes, referred to as `double-description' cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the language in the forgery statute is sufficiently ambiguous such that we cannot resolve the unit of prosecution simply by examining the language of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.