Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 N.Y. 152 - Reed v. . Chilson

Reed v. . Chilson’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 1970
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1970 · most notably Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. (1910), Henderson v. Henderson (1928)

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 35 state decisions

150189419001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Olcott v. . MacLean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is urged that the defendants were obliged to appear and present the facts to the court or suffer default, and therefore the appearance was not voluntary. This does not change the effect of the appearance. When a party does not intend to subject himself to the jurisdiction of the court, he must appear specially for the purpose of raising the question of jurisdiction by ^ motion. or lie may allow the plaintiff to go on and take judgment by default without affecting his rights, since no judgment entered without service of process in some form could bind the defendant, and the question^ of jurisdiction would protect Mm at any stage of the proceedings for its enforcement, provided it has not been waived by his own act. But, if the defendant elects 10 come before the court and there try the questions, he cannot afterwards deny the jurisdiction, of be heard to claim that it was not a voluntary appearance.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.