Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ohio App. 3d 16 - In Re Smith

142 Ohio App. 3d 16 - In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2025

21 state decisions

80200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Gault · Kent v. United States · Schall v. Martin · State v. Gleason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any instrument, device, or thing capable of inflicting death, and designed or specially adapted for use as a weapon, or possessed, carried, or used as a weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.