142 Ohio App. 3d 389 - State v. Childs’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

44 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"I. The evidence is insufficient as a matter of law, to prove `by clear and convincing evidence' that appellant is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually oriented offenses."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Butler, Unpublished Decision (8-31-2006) · State v. Renshaw, 88840 (8-9-2007)

2. “a purpose to gratify the sexual needs or desires of the offender.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Florer, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2006) · State v. Gebbie, C-060505 (6-22-2007)

3. “prior criminal * * * record regarding all offenses, including, but not limited to, all sexual offenses[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Flores, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2005)