Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ohio App. 3d 397 - State v. Bryson

142 Ohio App. 3d 397 - State v. Bryson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably People v. Timmsen (2016), State v. MacK (2002)

34 state decisions

250200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Florida v. Royer · Ornelas v. United States · Delaware v. Prouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This conclusion is reflective of the realization that citizens will avoid contact with police for reasons other than fear of being caught for a crime they have committed. A completely innocent person may wish to avoid the delay which a discussion with police may entail; others have a fear of police authority; still others resent and seek to avoid the “hassle” of a stop which lacks any basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “), appeals from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court granting the motion to suppress of defendant-appellee, Melvin Lomax (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The reviewing court must accept the trial court's findings of fact if they are supported by competent, credible evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.