Greulich v. Monnin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1943

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1943-07-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1943-07-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Joint Council Dining Car Employees Local 370 v. Delaware, L. & W. R. (1946), Bocchino v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance (1998)

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 32 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Turner, J.,

¶1 concurring. The company accepted the overdue premium payment without objection and without extending the last six months ’ period. The policy was, therefore, in force at the time of the accident.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Case posture

Posture: APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Miami county. In the Court of Common Pleas the plaintiff was awarded a verdict and judgment in the sum of $10,000 as damages for injuries she sustained to her person at 11:30 p. m. March 6, 1935, when an automobile in which she was a passenger collided with another motor vehicle operated by the defendant Monnin to whom a policy of liability insurance had been issued by the Motorists Mutual Insurance Company. Subsequently the plaintiff obtained leave to make the insurance company a new party defendant and then filed a supplemental petition asking a judgment against the company for $5,000 — the amount of the policy — in partial satisfaction of the judgment that previously had been rendered in her favor against Monnin. A jury was waived, and the trial court found in favor of the plaintiff in conformity with the prayer of her supplemental petition. On an appeal to the Court of Appeals on questions of law the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. The case is in this court for review by reason of the allowance of the defendant insurance company's motion to certify the record.

Source: CourtListener

Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Parallel citations

50 N.E.2d 310
26 OhioOp. 314