Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ohio St. 3d 71 - State v. Johnson

142 Ohio St. 3d 71 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. Goodwill Industries of Akron, Inc. · Buckingham Coal Co. v. Santo · State v. Holin · In re Disqualification of Parker · State v. Rebecca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statutory right to seek disqualification of a judge is an extraordinary remedy. A judge is presumed to follow the law and not to be biased, and the appearance of bias or prejudice must be compelling to overcome these presumptions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.