Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Okla. 1 - In Re Bliss

In Re Bliss’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
3
states following
April 1970
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 1970 · most notably Zachary v. City of Wagoner (1930), Protest of Bledsoe (1932)

1 federal appellate · 55 state decisions

410192919301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley · Grubb v. Smiley · Perrine v. Bonaparte, Co. · Aaronson v. Smiley · Dickinson v. Blackwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is clear to us that a net balance or surplus derived from the operation of a municipally owned and operated water plant must be accounted for by the municipal officers in the published financial statement and estimate, and that the excise board, in making the appropriations, shall consider the net balance or surplus therefrom in making the levies. It is clear that the inclusion of. the water plant operations in the current expense fund will give that fund the benefiir of that surplus. If the municipal officers eleet to handle the water plant separate and apart, from the current expense fund and that plant-produces a net surplus or balance, the taxpayers of the municipality are entitled to' have that net surplus or balance considered! in making the levy for current expense or for-the sinking fund to the end that the neeesr sary tax levies may be reduced.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.