Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 PACOMMW 393 - Seeherman v. Commonwealth

Seeherman v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 386 Pa. Super. 547 - Commonwealth v. McGinley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a summary case, a citation of the specific section and subsection of the statute or ordinance allegedly violated, together with a summary of the facts sufficient to advise the defendant of the nature of the offense charged....” (Emphasis added.) The same language is contained in Pa.R.Crim.P. 53, dealing with citations. See footnote 2 of this opinion. . Ackerman falls within the definition of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant shall not be discharged nor shall a ease be dismissed because of a defect in the form or content of a complaint, citation, summons, or warrant ... unless the defendant raises the defect before the conclusion of the summary trial and the defect is prejudicial to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.