Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 SO 621 - Brannin v. Clements

Brannin v. Clements’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 1953
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1953

4 state decisions

20193219401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Godchaux v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. · Succession of Baumgarden · New Orleans, Mobile & Chattanooga Railroad v. Bougere · Villeneuve Leblanc, Jr. & Co. v. Perroux · Tutorship of Minor Heirs of Byland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This method of service is, we think, fair and safe, really safer than the domiciliary service, and constitutes due process of law, and is neither objectionable nor unconstitutional, as contended for by defendant. Counsel for defendant says our Supreme Court has never passed on the constitutionality of the act under consideration, and that, though the courts are divided on this subject, the better' rule is that such statutes are unconstitutional. We do not so find and hold that the substituted service provided for in the statute under-discussion constitutes due process of law, and is not amenable to the objection urged by learned counsel for defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This brings us to the consideration of the defense by the exceptor that the service of citation, through the curator, was not in compliance with due process of law, and therefore unconstitutional.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.