142 So. 3d 1063 - Guidry v. Bernard’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 893 So. 2d 32 - Driscoll v. Stucker · 561 So. 2d 76 - Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Inc. · 588 So. 2d 79 - Miller v. Leonard · Fridge v. Talbert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot or will not appear in court and testify to the substance of his statement made outside of court. This includes situations in which the declarant:... [i]s absent from the hearing and the proponent of his statement has been unable to procure his attendance by process or other reasonable means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Landrieu“a witness is not unavailable for purposes of the exception to the confrontation requirement unless the authorities have made a diligent and good faith effort to obtain his presence at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Landrieu“The party asserting the admissibility of the statement bears the burden of proving the unavailability of the declarant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Landrieu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.