Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Batson v. Kentucky · Payton v. New York · Puckett v. United States · United States v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'not only seriously affect[ed] [the appellant's]”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lockhart v. State · Townes v. State““In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“' Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 489 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), aff'd, 577 So.2d 531 (Ala.1991) (quoting Johnson v. Wainwright , 778 F.2d 623 , 629 n. 6 (11th Cir.1985) ).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Townes v. State · Creque v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.